Essay on The Tradtional American

Essay on The Tradtional American Essay on The Tradtional American The United States has been built on immigrants from the very beginning. Many people here can trace their ancestry back to another country. The only â€Å"true† Americans are the Native Americans. Every person in the United States has a heritage from another country somewhere along their family tree. So why are Americans so easy to judge people by their color of skin, the way they dress, or the way they talk? In reality no â€Å"American† has the right to judge someone else, when he is not fully American. The clichà © of â€Å"hey you’re in America, now speak American† is an invalid statement because Americans speak English not American. Yes, people from other countries should have to learn English but no, they should not have to lose their own language. When an American moves to a different country he learns the native language there, but does not forget English. It should be the same way when people move here. It is amazing that schools and businesses operate in all the different languages it takes to communicate with others because it is not very easy for someone to move here and immediately know the native language. Moving to America is a choice many people make because there are so many opportunities here, and those opportunities should not be narrowed because of the language barrier. When someone makes the choice to move to America, he should not be expected to change his ways. He should be allowed to keep his native heritage. Americans could learn something u seful from an immigrant instead of being so judgmental and not even giving a person a chance. Immigrants could bring America many new things such as new clothes and music. When an immigrant moves here he is expected to follow the law and pay taxes just like every American. There should not be any difference between Americans and immigrants when it comes to paying for items. Immigrants go to jail just like Americans do when they do something wrong like being intoxicated in public or even murdering someone. If Americans never give other people respect how can they expect to get respect from them? Immigrants should not be forced to be just like Americans. If they were meant to be

Prepararse Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, and Examples

Prepararse Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, and Examples The verb prepararse is a reflexive verb that means to prepare yourself, to get prepared, or to get ready for something. Since this verb is often used reflexively, this article includes prepararse conjugations with reflexive pronouns in the indicative mood (present, past, conditional, and future), the subjunctive mood (present and past), the imperative mood, and other verb forms. Preparar vs. Prepararse The verb prepararse can also be used non-reflexively as preparar, which is always accompanied by a direct object. Preparar can be used to talk about preparing things like food or materials, or to talk about preparing people, as in training them for a job or sport competition. When talking about getting ready to go out, like getting dressed, etc., a more common verb is alistarse. Present Indicative When conjugating a reflexive verb, the reflexive pronoun should be included before each conjugated verb. Yo me preparo Yo me preparo para mis exmenes. I prepare for my exams. Tà º te preparas Tà º te preparas para la carrera. You prepare for the race. Usted/à ©l/ella se prepara Ella se prepara para su nuevo trabajo. She prepares for her new job. Nosotros nos preparamos Nosotros nos preparamos para dar un discurso en la conferencia. We get ready to give a speech at the conference. Vosotros os preparis Vosotros os preparis para hacer un largo viaje. You get ready to make a long trip. Ustedes/ellos/ellas se preparan Ellos se preparan para recibir a los invitados. They prepare to receive the guests. Preterite Indicative Use the preterite tense when you want to describe completed actions in the past. Yo me preparà © Yo me preparà © para mis exmenes. I prepared for my exams. Tà º te preparaste Tà º te preparaste para la carrera. You preparedfor the race. Usted/à ©l/ella se preparà ³ Ella se preparà ³ para su nuevo trabajo. She preparedfor her new job. Nosotros nos preparamos Nosotros nos preparamos para dar un discurso en la conferencia. We got ready to give a speech at the conference. Vosotros os preparasteis Vosotros os preparasteis para hacer un largo viaje. You got ready to make a long trip. Ustedes/ellos/ellas se prepararon Ellos se prepararon para recibir a los invitados. They preparedto receive the guests. Imperfect Indicative Use the imperfect tense when you want to describe actions in the past that were ongoing or repeated. You can translate the imperfect as was getting ready or used to get ready. Yo me preparaba Yo me preparaba para mis exmenes. I was preparing for my exams. Tà º te preparabas Tà º te preparabas para la carrera. You were preparingfor the race. Usted/à ©l/ella se preparaba Ella se preparaba para su nuevo trabajo. She was preparingfor her new job. Nosotros nos preparbamos Nosotros nos preparbamos para dar un discurso en la conferencia. We were getting ready to give a speech at the conference. Vosotros os preparabais Vosotros os preparabais para hacer un largo viaje. You were getting ready to make a long trip. Ustedes/ellos/ellas se preparaban Ellos se preparaban para recibir a los invitados. They were preparingto receive the guests. Future Indicative There are two forms of the future tense. The simple future is conjugated with the infinitive form and the future tense endings (à ©, s, , emos, à ©is, n). Yo me prepararà © Yo me prepararà © para mis exmenes. I will prepare for my exams. Tà º te preparars Tà º te preparars para la carrera. You will preparefor the race. Usted/à ©l/ella se preparar Ella se prepararpara su nuevo trabajo. She will preparefor her new job. Nosotros nos prepararemos Nosotros nos prepararemos para dar un discurso en la conferencia. We will getreadyto give a speech at the conference. Vosotros os prepararà ©is Vosotros os prepararà ©is para hacer un largo viaje. You will getready to make a long trip. Ustedes/ellos/ellas se prepararn Ellos se prepararn para recibir a los invitados. They will prepareto receive the guests. Periphrastic  Future Indicative   The other form of the future tense is the periphrastic future, which is conjugated with three components, the verb ir (to go), the preposition a, and the infinitive preparar. Remember to place the reflexive pronoun before the conjugated verb ir (to go). Yo me voy a preparar Yo me voya preparar para mis exmenes. I am going to prepare for my exams. Tà º te vasa preparar Tà º te vasa preparar para la carrera. You aregoing to preparefor the race. Usted/à ©l/ella se vaa preparar Ella se vaa preparar para su nuevo trabajo. She isgoing to preparefor her new job. Nosotros nos vamosa preparar Nosotros nos vamosa preparar para dar un discurso en la conferencia. We aregoing to get readyto give a speech at the conference. Vosotros os vais a preparar Vosotros os vaisa preparar para hacer un largo viaje. You aregoing to get ready to make a long trip. Ustedes/ellos/ellas se vana preparar Ellos se vana preparar para recibir a los invitados. They aregoing to prepareto receive the guests. Present Progressive/Gerund Form In Spanish, the gerund or present participle is often used as an adverb or to form progressive tenses like the present progressive. When conjugating progressive tenses there are two options for placement of the reflexive pronoun: it can go before the conjugated auxiliary verb estar, or attached to the end of the present participle. Present Progressive ofPrepararse se est preparando / est preparndose Ella se est preparando para su nuevo trabajo. She is preparing for her new job. Past Participle Similarly to English, in Spanish the past participle is used in perfect tenses like the present perfect. In perfect tenses the reflexive pronoun must be placed before the conjugated auxiliary verb haber. Present Perfect of Prepararse se ha preparado Ella se ha preparado para su nuevo trabajo. She has prepared for her new job. Conditional Indicative If you want to talk about possibilities, you can use the conditional tense. Yo me prepararà ­a Yo me prepararà ­a para mis exmenes si tuviera tiempo. I would prepare for my exams if I had time. Tà º te prepararà ­as Tà º te prepararà ­as para la carrera si estuvieras motivado. You would preparefor the race if you were motivated. Usted/à ©l/ella se prepararà ­a Ella se prepararà ­apara su nuevo trabajo, pero ella conoce bien el material. She would preparefor her new job, but she knows the material well. Nosotros nos prepararà ­amos Nosotros nos prepararà ­amos para dar un discurso en la conferencia, pero no tenemos tiempo. We would getreadyto give a speech at the conference, but we don't have time. Vosotros os prepararà ­ais Vosotros os prepararà ­ais para hacer un largo viaje si tuvierais ms dinero. You would getready to make a long trip if you had more money. Ustedes/ellos/ellas se prepararà ­an Ellos se prepararà ­an para recibir a los invitados si decidieran venir. They would prepareto receive the guests if they decided to come. Present Subjunctive Que yo me prepare La maestra espera que yo me prepare para mis exmenes. The teacher hopes that I prepare for my exams. Que tà º te prepares El entrenador sugiere que tà º te prepares para la carrera. The coach suggests that you prepare for the race. Que usted/à ©l/ella seprepare El jefe espera que ella se prepare para su nuevo trabajo. The boss hopes that she prepares for her new job. Que nosotros nos preparemos El profesor recomienda que nosotros nos preparemos para dar un discurso en la conferencia. The professor recommends that we get ready to give a speech at the conference. Que vosotros os preparà ©is Carlos pide que vosotros os preparà ©is para hacer un largo viaje. Carlos asks that you get ready to make a long trip. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas sepreparen Marta pide que ellos se preparen para recibir a los invitados. Marta asks that they prepare to receive the guests. Imperfect Subjunctive There are two possible ways of conjugating the imperfect subjunctive: Option 1 Que yo me preparara La maestra esperaba que yo me preparara para mis exmenes. The teacher hoped that I prepare for my exams. Que tà º te prepararas El entrenador sugerà ­a que tà º te prepararas para la carrera. The coach suggested that you prepare for the race. Que usted/à ©l/ella sepreparara El jefe esperaba que ella se preparara para su nuevo trabajo. The boss hoped that she prepared for her new job. Que nosotros nos preparramos El profesor recomendaba que nosotros nos preparramospara dar un discurso en la conferencia. The professor recommended that we get ready to give a speech at the conference. Que vosotros os prepararais Carlos pedà ­a que vosotros os prepararais para hacer un largo viaje. Carlos asked that you get ready to make a long trip. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas seprepararan Marta pedà ­a que ellos se prepararan para recibir a los invitados. Marta asked that they prepare to receive the guests. Option 2ï » ¿ Que yo me preparase La maestra esperaba que yo me preparase para mis exmenes. The teacher hoped that I get ready for my exams. Que tà º te preparases El entrenador sugerà ­a que tà º te preparases para la carrera. The coach suggested that you get ready for the race. Que usted/à ©l/ella sepreparase El jefe esperaba que ella se preparase para su nuevo trabajo. The boss hoped that she get ready for her new job. Que nosotros nos preparsemos El profesor recomendaba que nosotros nos preparsemospara dar un discurso en la conferencia. The professor recommended that we get ready to give a speech at the conference. Que vosotros os preparaseis Carlos pedà ­a que vosotros os preparaseis para hacer un largo viaje. Carlos asked that you get ready to make a long trip. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas sepreparasen Marta pedà ­a que ellos se preparasen para recibir a los invitados. Marta asked that they get ready to receive the guests. Imperative If you want to give an order or command you need the imperative mood. When conjugating a reflexive verb, note that in positive commands, the reflexive pronoun goes after the verb, while in negative commands, the reflexive pronoun goes before the verb. Positive Commands Tà º preprate  ¡Preprate para la carrera! Get ready for the race! Usted preprese  ¡Preprese para su nuevo trabajo! Get ready for your new job! Nosotros preparà ©monos  ¡Preparà ©monos para dar un discurso en la conferencia! Let's get ready to give a speech at the conference! Vosotros preparaos  ¡Preparaos para hacer un largo viaje! Get ready to make a long trip! Ustedes preprense  ¡Preprense para recibir a los invitados! Get ready to receive the guests! Negative Commands Tà º no te prepares  ¡No te prepares para la carrera! Don't get ready for the race! Usted no se prepare  ¡No se prepare para su nuevo trabajo! Don't get ready for your new job! Nosotros no nos preparemos  ¡No nos preparemos para dar un discurso en la conferencia! Let's not get ready to give a speech at the conference! Vosotros no os preparà ©is  ¡No os preparà ©is para hacer un largo viaje! Don't get ready to make a long trip! Ustedes no se preparen  ¡No se preparen para recibir a los invitados! Don't get ready to receive the guests!

Fascism, Nazism and Imperialism and the Cold War Essay

Fascism, Nazism and Imperialism and the Cold War - Essay Example In the first place involving the First and Second World War, there were visions of Fascism in Italy, Nazism in Germany and Imperialism in Japan. These visions greatly contributed to the outbreak of the Second World War (Gaddis, 1990). These three political visions: Fascism, Nazism and Imperialism had some kind of widespread similarities and as well some differences. Fascism is a dictatorial or totalitarian political ideology entirely connected with a mass movement that refers the person secondary to the interests of the nation, party or general public in general. Fascists look forward to attaining national unity, in most instances founded on however, not restricted to national, cultural, tribal, religious factors (Gaddis, 1990). Scholars characterize diverse features to fascism, however the following factors are in most cases regarded as fundamental: loyalty, nationalism, socialization, militarism, totalitarianism and anti-communism, corporatism, populism, despotism and resistance to political and economic laissez-faire. Nazism also known as National Socialism (Nationalsozialismus) is an ideology and system linked to the 20th century German Nazi Party and nation. Nazism is characterized as a way of fascism that entails natural racism and anti Semitism (De Grand, 2004). Nazism primarily originates from the influence of Pan Germanism, the Volkisch German nationalists association and the anti communist Freikorps paramilitary tradition in post First World War Germany that a large number of people in Germany thought that they had been disgraced by the Treaty of Versailles (De Grand, 2004). In this regard, Nazism is directly similar to Fascism in all actions and practices. Imperialism is distinguished as a code of conduct in relation to the mindset of an individual (Heller, 2006). It is comprehended in connection with Empire construction, as the forceful boundary of a country’s power by protective conquest setting up the economic and political command of other countries. Imperialism further implies to the mind-set of dominance, subordination and authority over foreign nationals (Heller, 2006). Over and above, this is the mindset of an individual or a group of people that create a kingdom, with ideologies of â€Å"global dominance†. There are a couple of similarities in Fascism, Nazism and Imperialism that led to the war and further agitating their allies (Britain, France, U.S. and Soviet Union). In the first place, these political systems are dictatorial, as clearly indicated by the control over all features of life and in every nation. Furthermore, the economic activities were under the command of the government and everyone had to comply with the set rules. In conclusion, these systems employed the expansionists and aggressive foreign policies. The Nazi, Fascists and the imperialists believed in unavoidable war and territorial expansion which agitated their allies (De Grand, 2004). This was due to the fact that, Italy, Japan and Germany posed serious territorial, economic, social and political threats (cold war) to their allies by use of these ideologies (De Grand, 2004). Option Three â€Å"Blame† It is clear that the topic of who caused the cold war is based on a blame game where various scholars especially from America and Britain indicate that Russia led to the Cold war whereas other scholars believe it was caused by America (Fedorov, 2011). In actual fact, Cold War was caused by America. Fedorov (2011) blamed the United States of America for the cold war, counting to the list of revisionists who believed that America led to the cold war. It is for the duration of the Vietnam War that people established that America was as bad as Russia. In the long run, America was the

Legislative and Executive Branches Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Legislative and Executive Branches - Assignment Example â€Å"the executive action that would offer real legal status to the immediate family of US citizens and permanent residents.†2 The senator has argued that the Senate Republicans should focus on revoking the 2014 order and allow the 2012 plan to remain intact. On the other hand, the Presidency has drawn a red line on the two executive actions by warning that the President will veto any legislation sent to him that seeks to topple the orders. The tussle over the executive order is taking place on a legislation to finance the Department of Homeland Security whose funding ends on February 27.3 I think President Obama needs to consult the Republicans on the issue of the executive actions. The issue of immigrants affects every American and it is a matter of national importance. Both the Republicans and the Democrats need to sit on a negotiation table and make a way forward on how to tackle the issue of immigrants. There are very many illegal immigrants in America who found themselves in the country because of their parents’ choice and circumstances. The negotiators must balance the rights of the migrants and the interest of the

Edward R. Murrow & Socrates Essay Example for Free

Edward R. Murrow Socrates Essay Indestructible courage, persistence and public service drove both Socrates and Murrow to live their lives with unwavering commitment for truth, critical thinking and unbendable integrity. With these values, Socrates and Murrow made their own lives as vivid examples of truth and veracity. They set the standards for all subsequent Western philosophy and the ideal broadcast journalism respectively. Nevertheless, their enduring courage may have brought them also to make half of themselves as merely ego maniacs or perhaps, self-centered intellectuals. Socrates pursuit of virtue and his strict adherence to truth clashed with the current course of Athenian politics and society. During his time, Socrates appears to have been a critic of democracy wherein some scholars had interpreted his trial as an expression of political infighting. He boldly face the charges made by the jury as seen in Platos â€Å"Apology,† an account of Socratess (unsuccessful) speech in his own defense before the Athenian jury. Socratess speech includes a detailed description of the motives and goals of philosophical activity as he practiced it, together with a passionate declaration of its value for life. I was really struck when Socrates purposefully gave a defiant defense to the jury because he believed he would be better off dead. With this statement, we can say that Socrates really happens to be a man of truth and valor similar to his modern counterpart, Edward Murrow. According to Wadleigh, â€Å" Murrow, at every juncture, did what he thought was right. He took risks that at the time seemed outrageous and he was not afraid of anything. † Furthermore, his exceptional courage is seen when he let Senator McCarthy hang himself with his open criticism program- but without any â€Å"expose† (Wershba Hottlelet). It was found out that Socratess works are often philosophical or dramatic texts rather than straightforward histories. Parallel to Murrow, â€Å" his voice made the words catch fire! The way he could add drama to the simplest looking text made him amazing! † (Wershba Kalb). Murrow offered himself to public service analogous to the teaching life of Socrates. Socrates pointedly declined to accept payment for his work with students whereas Murrow fearlessly did his job as a broadcaster. â€Å" He was a driven reporter – truly driven to tell people what was going on. He do it with intensity! † (Hottlelet) Plato refers to Socrates as the gadfly of the state (as the gadfly stings the horse into action, so Socrates stung Athens), insofar as he irritated the establishment with considerations of justice and the pursuit of goodness. If Socrates stung Athens, then Murrow stung America: â€Å" using his charisma, integrity and personal standards† (Wershba). It is Socrates and Murrows critical thinking that made themselves â€Å"men of worth. † Socrates showed this (critical thinking) through his philosophical works while Murrow made this appear through his jobs as a writer and broadcaster. These two men were really exceptional by committing themselves in pursuit of truth. However, their deep thinking and boldness has somehow conflicted their commitment to truth thus making half of themselves as merely ego maniacs or self-centered intellectuals. It was supported by the reasons why Murrow left his job at CBS: â€Å"Then there was the other side of Murrow, the driven news reporter. Murrow made Harvest of Shame and showed the rotten spots of American life. [CBS Chairman William] Paley didn’t like that. It scared away sponsors. Paley wanted it tame. Murrow wanted it real. † (Hottlelet) Another statement was from Hewitt telling that â€Å" Murrow would talk with his Person to Person guests beforehand Murrow felt that for entertainment some discussion to prepare the subjects was legitimate. Paley disagreed, so Murrow left. † He has that hidden pride in his self. Like what Ive said earlier, he did what he thought was right which is to leave CBS. Another thing I noticed about Murrow is his sense of egoism or perhaps, self-importance. It was stated in one of the interviews that â€Å"Murrow selected very good people, who, in his presence, got better. Those around him never wanted to disappoint or embarrass Ed—so they pushed themselves to their outer limits He set the pace; he was the example. † (Kalb) This statement was further supported by Hottlelet â€Å"He never gave instructions. He knew his worth. I think he just expected the trained reporters he hired to follow his example. † The life of Socrates appears to be really parallel to the life of Edward Murrow. By following what they thought was right and by pursuing the truth, they made half of themselves as the greatest and the most defiant men in history but half as conceited and egoistic individuals of all times.

Economy :: Unions Labor Work Papers

Unions Why Unions? "Unions are groups of working people who join to talk to employers about wages and conditions of work instead of workers talking to employers on an individual basis."1 Because they speak for everybody, unions can get a better deal for each worker than one employee could by negotiating with the employer. As seen in the short movie "WHY UNIONS?", non-unionized workers talks about the unfair treatment they experience in the work place. Through collective action, workers formed unions so they could have a voice in deciding wages, hours, working conditions and dealing with the many problems arises in the workplace. Unions are not just organizations trying to get more dollars and cents or better working conditions for people who hold union cards. People who don't enjoy the benefits of union protection get benefits too. "The labour movement was in the forefront of the struggles for public health care, for public education, for minimum wages, holidays and employment conditions."2 1 D. Martin, Form War To Peace, Canadian Labour Congress, Quebec, 1991, P.17 2 Notes On Unions, Canadian Labour Congress, Quebec, 1992, P.1 Union Nowadays "Unions are like businesses: their success depends upon attracting and retaining buyers (new members). Recently, one of the major problems faced by the union movement is that few Canadians understand what services unions come into public."3 The public also don't know the union is also helping Canada in other parts of areas such as economy, etc. The public think that the only time unions come into the public's eye is as a result of strike or withdrawal of services. This is because of the impressed strikes held by the union workers. The memorable one would be the strike held by the Toronto Transit Commission workers back in September 1991. The lack of transportation resulted in inconveniences among the public. The Canadian public becomes upset over conflict. The strikes make the public forget about the contributions of unions in other areas. "From a marketing perspective, the union movement has positioned itself like the nuclear industry -- it receives attention only when it is about to blow up, melt or leak."4 Five important needs for union movements are: 3 Alistair Davidson and Ian Mckinnon, "Unions need to study marketing," The Globe and Mail, May 8 1984, Business section, P.8

Psy/265 Sexuality at Different Life Stages Essay

There are changes in every stage of life including sexual changes that follow us as we grow older. With the following scenario’s that talk about the different points of our awareness and stages of sexual relationships, I will suggest from a counselors perspective ways to help each person in the settings presented. The first case is Anna, an adolescent girl, is very much in love with her boyfriend who is three years older than she. He is putting a lot of pressure on her to have sex. At the same time, she is anxious about her parents’ attitude towards her boyfriend. Her mother constantly warns her about dating an older boy and assumes that he intends to take advantage of her. The first thing I would go about is setting a relaxed and comfortable exchange to allow Anna to express her own opinions, in doing so I would simply ask her what she feels about having sex with her boyfriend, not how her parents feel, not how her boyfriend feels, but how does she feel about it. I would then ask her is she was prepared to have sex, has she discussed with her boyfriend what precautions they would take, and what they would be prepared to do if something happened and she became pregnant. Some of the questions would be directed towards her once I could visually observe her, I would ask her if she was feeling peer pressure to have sex, or if her boyfriend was pressuring her to have sex. I would also explain that sometimes it is okay to say no to sex and just because her friends say they have or are encouraging her to have sex does not necessarily mean it is the right decision for her. I would also enter into a discussion of what sex means to her, and bring about the questions to see if she feels if she does not have sex with him she would perhaps loose him. I would recommend to her that she see a gynecologist or her family doctor to further explore all the birth control options and make sure she understands that even though it is a shared responsibility with her and her boyfriend, she should make sure she is practicing safe sex. For me I would also mention that her mother is concerned, because Anna is her daughter. I would ask her if she had any questions for me, and then assure her that what ever we discuss is between us and she can feel free to come to talk with me at anytime. I would also tell her to take all the time she needed to come to her decision, and make it because it is what is right for her. I am a realist, and all we can do is provide the kids with good information and hope that we have given them enough of it for them to make a decision that is right and safe for them. Tom and Susan are an elderly couple. Tom has been retired for several years, and Susan is more recently retired. She has shown a renewed interest in sexual activity. Tom has not reciprocated Susan’s interest as he is anxious about his sexual ability at this age. I feel it would be best to first address some issues with Tom and see if he felt there was a possible physical reason that perhaps he had not brought up prior to this. Several factors may play a role in sexual inactivity including declining activity, physical problems, boredom, and attitudes about sex among older people. If he was having physical issues I would suggest to him that perhaps he should see his physician about some of the things that may help in this area. Many men have problems with erections due to stress and other factors, and when you can get to the cause of it, there is often help for it. I would discuss with them about Susan’s recent retirement and see if that change has triggered her to have some extra energy and less stress from not having a regular scheduled job. I would suggest that they try date night, or think about activities or things that used to make them feel more romantic, and suggest that they try to stop thinking about it and just let it naturally occur. Go out and do things that make you both happy, couple things, individual things, get to know each other again because in a sense that is what they are doing, getting to know each other again. I would encourage them to communicate and talk about things, not turn the television on or the phone on when they go to bed, and discuss their needs openly with each other and figure out what will meet both of their needs. Bill has been paralyzed from the waist down since he was a child. He is involved in a romantic relationship and wishes to be intimate with his partner but is unsure how to express his interest. Bill becomes very nervous and uncomfortable when talking about this subject Sex and the ability to have sex with a partner and have a long term intimate relationship is desired as much by people with a disability as it is with most people. The amount of physical sexual function and ability to feel pleasure or pain sensation is often the first thing they think of, raising fear and anxiety. Yet it is something we all desire because sex enriches our lives and brings us to understanding and closer relationships with our partners. People with a physical disability often have a poor self body image, thinking they are damaged goods, broken, somehow less than. These feelings are normal you should talk about them with your partner, but don’t dwell on them. Healthy love making is about pleasing your partner. Often people in Bill’s situation find excitement and release simply from the closeness of pleasuring their partner. Healthy sexuality involves warmth, tenderness, and love, not just genital contact, so I would encourage Bill to step outside of his comfort zone and talk to his partner about how he feels. I recommend that Bill seek his physician’s medical opinion and assistance to see if one of the clinical treatments for erectile dysfunction, such as Viagra could improve the quality of erections and sexual activity with him. I would also remind him that orgasm after paralysis is possible for some men but it is often not the same as it is usually defined. It can become less physical, less focused on the genitals and more about his state of mind. It is important Bill comes to understand that the loss of sensation does not rule out loss of sexuality. In conclusion, we all experience sexual awareness and activity during all ages of our lives. So we all need to take a moment to just breathe and know we are not alone. Talk to our partners, talk with our physicians/counselors and learn what will work for you in your own situation. Take control of your life and learn to understand your own body. References Rathus, S. A. , Nevid, J. S. , and Fichner-Rathus, L. (2011). Human sexuality in a world of diversity. (8th ed. ) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

A study of gender inequality in different child custody cases Essay

Gender inequality in child custody cases has been happening since custody hearings were created. Today, fathers are less likely to win custody of their children; resulting in court and legal fees that the mothers do not have to pay. Regardless of the parents living situation or income, if the mother is physically healthy enough to raise the child, she has a major advantage.   On top of everything else, men are more likely to owe increasing child support, even if they are hurt or arrested for non-payment. It’s inequality like this that has plagued the family courts forever, giving them a biased and bad name. Going back to times such as the 1970s, it is well noted that even then gender inequality was quite rampant. Not only is it now well-known and admitted, but many feel with the removal of ‘tender years’ law (feeling that women raised the children, this should be primary caregiver) that inequality was taken care of; this obviously not being the case.   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Indeed, typical statutory provisions at least implicitly encourage courts to consider past parental participation. Moreover, evidence that courts continue to favor mothers in custody disputes suggests that the pre-divorce caretaking function is valued.† (Elizabeth S. Scott) Not only is this seen and documented to be the same for many states; it can get even worse for small towns and municipals as their rulings have a higher chance to be biased and go unpunished and undocumented. While there are waivers to get court fees waived, many times the court rejects these fee waivers; resulting in immense costs for fathe r. If the father wants to claim custody of his child, some places may make the father file a petition for adoption (even if he is the biological father), which cost money to file. Fees for this could range from $20 to $200; something a struggling father with legal fees could usually not easily pay. With all these legal fees the father will also have to pay for any attorney fees; and for the attorney themselves. There have been many reported cases of mothers who can not support their children, being awarded custody for supposedly other reasons; while the father who could support the child is writing off as unfit. For example, there have been several cases where homeless mothers were award full custody of their children, while the father had a stable living situation. Not only living situation wise, but women who don’t have a stable source of income are often not seen as a problem in the eyes of the court. It operates under the guidance that women can get more government aid (such as welfare) for their children; often resulting in poor treatment of children due to improper nutrition and medical care. All of this is taking place due to courts going for what they feel would be the ‘best interest’ of the child, rather than the main negatives and benefits for each parent. More often than not, more care is done when a parent informs the court they want to move out of state with the child. This usually brings about a full inspection into both parents history, so to decide the right choice and not send a child out of state with an unfit parent. Operating on this backing is wrong, and this concept should be applied to every family court case regardless of circumstances or not. However, if a father was awarded custody, and wanted to move out of state to â€Å"start fresh again† or maybe â€Å"pursue love in another are†then more often than not the court would deny the father the ability to move out of state. â€Å"Where I practice, a parent wishing to move with their child out of state has to pass a two-part test. Part One: show the court a legitimate reason to move. Part Two: show the court that the move is in the best interests of the child.† (Nancy Shannon) More often than not courts find a problem with moving the child out of the mother’s state, due to incorrect thinking that all mothers are the best fit to parent their childre n; or they need to have the ability to be in contact with their children. On top of the discrimination and work required most fathers need to do in order to get custody of their child if they fail the results could end up being crippling and life ruining.   If a father is made to pay child support, right out of the court he is already in debt. Not only are the legal fees now imposed, but he now has to pay an additional monthly fee; sometimes even surpassing the cost of their monthly rent. This leads a lot of child support payers to end up not being able to pay; resulting in their arrest. What makes the entire situation worse is that once in jail their fees do not stop. The debts continue to accrue and once they get out, it could become a vicious cycle of not being able to pay, being arrested, and then being released. Yet somehow this is not the entire story of it. If you get hurt or have a medical injury making you unable to work, your payments still do not stop. You have to make a petition to the judge with proper documentation (which could be costly to print out depending on state medical information laws) and even then a judge may decide your injury is not debilitating enough. This one event in a person’s life could result in the rest of their life being ruined. â€Å"All I was saying was, ‘Give me an opportunity instead of throwing me in jail because that just puts me further behind in child support,’† Ferebee says. â€Å"Let me find work so I can earn money.’† This year, Ferebee was headed to jail a fifth time for failure to pay child support.† (Tina Griego) This could turn your life into a ‘debtors prison’ where there is no hope for escape, and once the process has started each day makes recovery more and more improbable. There should be more options available to the father that cannot pay; such as working the payment off in community service or being forced to an assigned job for a certain amount of payment until the balance is resolved. This not only means fewer pe ople in the jails for non-violent crimes but a better chance at actually paying the debt.   Unfortunately, the standard today is to just increase the debt hoping that the person could eventually afford it. One of the most compelling arguments against gender bias in court would have to be that because women usually take care of the children more often, they should be the primary caretaker. Several well-known judges had been surveyed about this, and many have told they feel this is not bias. Most judges are not getting a direct view of the household. That is why each case needs to be verified on a person-to-person basis, rather than a gender basis (i.e. look at BOTH the mother and father for the best living situation). â€Å"Her article holds that mother preference is not a gender biased opinion if the mother was the primary caretaker of the child‟s past.   She writes that bias is often seen because â€Å"fathers   are often given more credit than mothers for doing what is expected of mothers, to penalize mothers more than fathers for extramarital affairs, and to think that a mother‟s investment in her career is selfish while a father‟s is the act of a responsible provider† (Lindsay R. Estep) This quote does wonder for speaking about the current legal system regarding gender. The court official who spoke in that quote clearly demonstrates (albeit with a bit of truth in some parts) gender bias, and fails to recognize it. There are also a few things that need to be addressed regarding the quote. When the official speaks about the mother being the primary caretaker, her assumptions are wrong. If a mother was a primary caretaker of the child (i.e. father works while the mother stays at home) that does not give her any more parental rights than the father and vice versa. One of the reason’s a divorce could be happening is due to the mother’s neglect of the child while the father was away. Going with the current logic of the court official, the neglectful mother would be given the child, due to previous caretaking. The issue is that is not just an isolated problem, many places all over experience this issue, and it’s met with no resistance. The correct part of the quote is true, a mother can work while the father stays at home and vice versa. If this was the case she would not, and should not be penalized. The problem with this all is nothing is being done. Even though the mass public outrage, and people standing up against bias, places like the Supreme Court fail to do anything to prevent further discrimination. â€Å"No case so clearly prohibits consideration of sex in custody cases. It should be noted, however, that there was a potential gender issue in Palmore that received no attention from the Supreme Court. It appears that Linda began cohabiting with Clarence before they were married.† (Katherine Bartlett) This case Is well known because it enforced and helped prove the clear gender bias of sex without marriage; regardless of if the bias was on the female â€Å"Nothing more seems to have been made of this factor, either by the trial court or on review, but some courts have since noticed that mothers who cohabit outside of marriage, tend to be penalized in ways fathers who cohabit outside of marriage are not.† (Katherine Bartlett) While women face the same gender bi as in some ways, in the ways people tend to care about (who gets the child, who pays fees, etc.) is where men get overlooked in quality. This quote is important because if it’s known and documented of a clear gender bias, why hasn’t the Supreme Court stepped in and introduced better legislation and guidelines to prevent further bias? The problem is old legislation, and the refusal to make a change. A currently former Supreme Court judge Antonin Scalia was quoted as saying the constitution does not dis-allow gender bias.   While not true, a Supreme Court judge, who supposedly should be speaking for the constitution, should not help spread and promote miss-information. On top of that, he was never corrected or reprimanded.   The only consequence of that action was ‘bad press’. This quote not only helps smaller local courts continue their bias but miss-informs them that they are acting legally.   Better legislation and better education for judges need t o be passed before anything can be done. And while there are many arguments that women also face these problems (and while that may be true) the problem it’s usually the men. Women are given more chances and exceptions than the men. Several document court cases have shown that on average women are given more chances to earn money and pay it, should they be ordered to pay child support. This could either be the judge informing them of state opportunities like welfare and social security, unlike the men who usually are faced with arrest threats or an actual arrest. Another idea in the system is that the reason they are in family court is often due to the father being unfit in the first place (I.e Domestic violence, threats, abuse). This is an obvious oversight into a small population of the people.   More often than not it’s just a case of a family not working well together, and no actual abuse or crimes have taken place. On top of that, when it comes to dishing out child support, the mother will likely have t he advantage; also awarded more money â€Å"In spring 1992, about one-half (6.2 million) of the 11.5 million custodial parents were awarded child support; award rates were higher for mothers than for fathers (56 percent compared with 41 percent)† (U.S. Department of Commerce) Overall, when it comes to dealing with the family courts, men are less likely to win custody of their own children. Those who have a chance at it, are often met with extreme legal fees more so than the mother. Women are often seen as a child’s protector so in the eyes of the court they are usually seen as the fit parent right from the start. It has also been noted that men’s job status and living situation is looked into more than the women’s. This is due to the assumption that women get more government aid to assist them than men; this not being true but is still a common misconception. Inequality in the courts has been taking place ever since they have been around. The problem isn’t that they refuse to acknowledge it, the problem is it’s acknowledged and yet nothing is done about it today. Works Cited: Elizabeth S. Scott.   Pluralism, Parental Preference, and Child Custody Berkley Scholarship Law,  Ã‚   May 1992 Nancy Shannon. Custody Relocation Case Study: A Judge’s Ruling on Moving Out Of State Cordell & Cordell Divorce Lawyer  Ã‚  Ã‚   May 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce. Who Receives Child Support? Economics and Statistics Administration. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS  Ã‚  Ã‚   June 1995 Tina Griego. Locking up parents for not paying child support can be a modern-day ‘debtor’s prison’  Ã‚  Ã‚   September 26, 2014 Lindsay R. Estep.   Mommy or Daddy?: Perceived Gender Bias and Court Awarded Custodial Guardianship   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   April 27, 2011 Katherine Bartlett. Comparing race and sex discrimination in custody cases   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Duke Law EDU A study of gender inequality in different child custody cases Essay Gender inequality in child custody cases has been happening since custody hearings were created. Today, fathers are less likely to win custody of their children; resulting in court and legal fees that the mothers do not have to pay. Regardless of the parents living situation or income, if the mother is physically healthy enough to raise the child, she has a major advantage.   On top of everything else, men are more likely to owe increasing child support, even if they are hurt or arrested for non-payment. It’s inequality like this that has plagued the family courts forever, giving them a biased and bad name. Going back to times such as the 1970s, it is well noted that even then gender inequality was quite rampant. Not only is it now well-known and admitted, but many feel with the removal of ‘tender years’ law (feeling that women raised the children, this should be primary caregiver) that inequality was taken care of; this obviously not being the case.   Ã¢â‚¬Å"Indeed, typical statutory provisions at least implicitly encourage courts to consider past parental participation. Moreover, evidence that courts continue to favor mothers in custody disputes suggests that the pre-divorce caretaking function is valued.† (Elizabeth S. Scott) Not only is this seen and documented to be the same for many states; it can get even worse for small towns and municipals as their rulings have a higher chance to be biased and go unpunished and undocumented. While there are waivers to get court fees waived, many times the court rejects these fee waivers; resulting in immense costs for fathe r. If the father wants to claim custody of his child, some places may make the father file a petition for adoption (even if he is the biological father), which cost money to file. Fees for this could range from $20 to $200; something a struggling father with legal fees could usually not easily pay. With all these legal fees the father will also have to pay for any attorney fees; and for the attorney themselves. There have been many reported cases of mothers who can not support their children, being awarded custody for supposedly other reasons; while the father who could support the child is writing off as unfit. For example, there have been several cases where homeless mothers were award full custody of their children, while the father had a stable living situation. Not only living situation wise, but women who don’t have a stable source of income are often not seen as a problem in the eyes of the court. It operates under the guidance that women can get more government aid (such as welfare) for their children; often resulting in poor treatment of children due to improper nutrition and medical care. All of this is taking place due to courts going for what they feel would be the ‘best interest’ of the child, rather than the main negatives and benefits for each parent. More often than not, more care is done when a parent informs the court they want to move out of state with the child. This usually brings about a full inspection into both parents history, so to decide the right choice and not send a child out of state with an unfit parent. Operating on this backing is wrong, and this concept should be applied to every family court case regardless of circumstances or not. However, if a father was awarded custody, and wanted to move out of state to â€Å"start fresh again† or maybe â€Å"pursue love in another are†then more often than not the court would deny the father the ability to move out of state. â€Å"Where I practice, a parent wishing to move with their child out of state has to pass a two-part test. Part One: show the court a legitimate reason to move. Part Two: show the court that the move is in the best interests of the child.† (Nancy Shannon) More often than not courts find a problem with moving the child out of the mother’s state, due to incorrect thinking that all mothers are the best fit to parent their childre n; or they need to have the ability to be in contact with their children. On top of the discrimination and work required most fathers need to do in order to get custody of their child if they fail the results could end up being crippling and life ruining.   If a father is made to pay child support, right out of the court he is already in debt. Not only are the legal fees now imposed, but he now has to pay an additional monthly fee; sometimes even surpassing the cost of their monthly rent. This leads a lot of child support payers to end up not being able to pay; resulting in their arrest. What makes the entire situation worse is that once in jail their fees do not stop. The debts continue to accrue and once they get out, it could become a vicious cycle of not being able to pay, being arrested, and then being released. Yet somehow this is not the entire story of it. If you get hurt or have a medical injury making you unable to work, your payments still do not stop. You have to make a petition to the judge with proper documentation (which could be costly to print out depending on state medical information laws) and even then a judge may decide your injury is not debilitating enough. This one event in a person’s life could result in the rest of their life being ruined. â€Å"All I was saying was, ‘Give me an opportunity instead of throwing me in jail because that just puts me further behind in child support,’† Ferebee says. â€Å"Let me find work so I can earn money.’† This year, Ferebee was headed to jail a fifth time for failure to pay child support.† (Tina Griego) This could turn your life into a ‘debtors prison’ where there is no hope for escape, and once the process has started each day makes recovery more and more improbable. There should be more options available to the father that cannot pay; such as working the payment off in community service or being forced to an assigned job for a certain amount of payment until the balance is resolved. This not only means fewer pe ople in the jails for non-violent crimes but a better chance at actually paying the debt.   Unfortunately, the standard today is to just increase the debt hoping that the person could eventually afford it. One of the most compelling arguments against gender bias in court would have to be that because women usually take care of the children more often, they should be the primary caretaker. Several well-known judges had been surveyed about this, and many have told they feel this is not bias. Most judges are not getting a direct view of the household. That is why each case needs to be verified on a person-to-person basis, rather than a gender basis (i.e. look at BOTH the mother and father for the best living situation). â€Å"Her article holds that mother preference is not a gender biased opinion if the mother was the primary caretaker of the child‟s past.   She writes that bias is often seen because â€Å"fathers   are often given more credit than mothers for doing what is expected of mothers, to penalize mothers more than fathers for extramarital affairs, and to think that a mother‟s investment in her career is selfish while a father‟s is the act of a responsible provider† (Lindsay R. Estep) This quote does wonder for speaking about the current legal system regarding gender. The court official who spoke in that quote clearly demonstrates (albeit with a bit of truth in some parts) gender bias, and fails to recognize it. There are also a few things that need to be addressed regarding the quote. When the official speaks about the mother being the primary caretaker, her assumptions are wrong. If a mother was a primary caretaker of the child (i.e. father works while the mother stays at home) that does not give her any more parental rights than the father and vice versa. One of the reason’s a divorce could be happening is due to the mother’s neglect of the child while the father was away. Going with the current logic of the court official, the neglectful mother would be given the child, due to previous caretaking. The issue is that is not just an isolated problem, many places all over experience this issue, and it’s met with no resistance. The correct part of the quote is true, a mother can work while the father stays at home and vice versa. If this was the case she would not, and should not be penalized. The problem with this all is nothing is being done. Even though the mass public outrage, and people standing up against bias, places like the Supreme Court fail to do anything to prevent further discrimination. â€Å"No case so clearly prohibits consideration of sex in custody cases. It should be noted, however, that there was a potential gender issue in Palmore that received no attention from the Supreme Court. It appears that Linda began cohabiting with Clarence before they were married.† (Katherine Bartlett) This case Is well known because it enforced and helped prove the clear gender bias of sex without marriage; regardless of if the bias was on the female â€Å"Nothing more seems to have been made of this factor, either by the trial court or on review, but some courts have since noticed that mothers who cohabit outside of marriage, tend to be penalized in ways fathers who cohabit outside of marriage are not.† (Katherine Bartlett) While women face the same gender bi as in some ways, in the ways people tend to care about (who gets the child, who pays fees, etc.) is where men get overlooked in quality. This quote is important because if it’s known and documented of a clear gender bias, why hasn’t the Supreme Court stepped in and introduced better legislation and guidelines to prevent further bias? The problem is old legislation, and the refusal to make a change. A currently former Supreme Court judge Antonin Scalia was quoted as saying the constitution does not dis-allow gender bias.   While not true, a Supreme Court judge, who supposedly should be speaking for the constitution, should not help spread and promote miss-information. On top of that, he was never corrected or reprimanded.   The only consequence of that action was ‘bad press’. This quote not only helps smaller local courts continue their bias but miss-informs them that they are acting legally.   Better legislation and better education for judges need t o be passed before anything can be done. And while there are many arguments that women also face these problems (and while that may be true) the problem it’s usually the men. Women are given more chances and exceptions than the men. Several document court cases have shown that on average women are given more chances to earn money and pay it, should they be ordered to pay child support. This could either be the judge informing them of state opportunities like welfare and social security, unlike the men who usually are faced with arrest threats or an actual arrest. Another idea in the system is that the reason they are in family court is often due to the father being unfit in the first place (I.e Domestic violence, threats, abuse). This is an obvious oversight into a small population of the people.   More often than not it’s just a case of a family not working well together, and no actual abuse or crimes have taken place. On top of that, when it comes to dishing out child support, the mother will likely have t he advantage; also awarded more money â€Å"In spring 1992, about one-half (6.2 million) of the 11.5 million custodial parents were awarded child support; award rates were higher for mothers than for fathers (56 percent compared with 41 percent)† (U.S. Department of Commerce) Overall, when it comes to dealing with the family courts, men are less likely to win custody of their own children. Those who have a chance at it, are often met with extreme legal fees more so than the mother. Women are often seen as a child’s protector so in the eyes of the court they are usually seen as the fit parent right from the start. It has also been noted that men’s job status and living situation is looked into more than the women’s. This is due to the assumption that women get more government aid to assist them than men; this not being true but is still a common misconception. Inequality in the courts has been taking place ever since they have been around. The problem isn’t that they refuse to acknowledge it, the problem is it’s acknowledged and yet nothing is done about it today. Works Cited:    Elizabeth S. Scott.   Pluralism, Parental Preference, and Child Custody Berkley Scholarship Law,  Ã‚   May 1992 Nancy Shannon. Custody Relocation Case Study: A Judge’s Ruling on Moving Out Of State Cordell & Cordell Divorce Lawyer  Ã‚  Ã‚   May 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce. Who Receives Child Support? Economics and Statistics Administration. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS  Ã‚  Ã‚   June 1995 Tina Griego. Locking up parents for not paying child support can be a modern-day ‘debtor’s prison’  Ã‚  Ã‚   September 26, 2014 Lindsay R. Estep.   Mommy or Daddy?: Perceived Gender Bias and Court Awarded Custodial Guardianship April 27, 2011 Katherine Bartlett. Comparing race and sex discrimination in custody cases Duke Law EDU

Social Determinants of Health Connection with High Essays - Health

Social Determinants of Health Connection with High Essays - Health Social Determinants of Health Connection with High Costs High Users of The Canadian Health Care System Fatima Zahid 213465976 HLST 2020: Power and Politics Kimberley Sauder March 20th 2017 It has been acknowledged for many years that a small number of individuals have been high users of the Canadian healthcare system taking up a large percentage of health care costs. This essay argues; social determinants of health is chronically linked to creating high users and high costs of the health care system. The authorities can significantly do better by sustaining strategies beyond hospital and traditional clinic setting addressing the relatively small number of individuals taking up proportion of health spending. Improving conditions of social determinants of health and enhancing our primary care department can limit levels of hospitalization. High users are often classified as the top 1%, 5%, or 10% of users. If the patient had experienced minimum of 3-times acute care hospital admission within the span of a year, along with cumulative length of stay longer than the period of 30 days he/she is a high user of the healthcare system. The Canadian Institute for Health Information has reported, 11% of individuals are hospitalized for 3+ days for acute care along with 10% for 30+ days of acute care (Defining High Users in Acute Care, pg. 7). To address the issue its important to identify the type of users involved including their socio-economic characteristics, sex, age, geography, a family physician, and the type of condition. In Canada, mainly the upper North provinces contain a lot of remote areas resulting to easier access towards hospitals rather than accessing primary care. Other groups of individuals that are high users of the health care system include seniors, children and people who are homeless. As stated in a thre e-year high user study published in The Canadian Medical Association Journal, the reason why children that are high users of the health care system is due to pre-mature birth, mental health disorders, and cancer chemotherapy (A 3-year study of high-cost users of health care, Walter P. Wodchis, Peter C. Austin, David A. Henry, 2016). In terms of adults and seniors the frequent diagnoses where chronic diseases such as atherosclerosis, chronic lung disease, pneumonia, heart failure, and the need for palliative care. Looking at the population of high users, as indicated by a table published in BioMed Central, high cost users (HCU) share characteristics of being physically inactive, current/formers drinkers or smokers, and over weight (BMC Health Services Research, 2014). That makes an individual think why do these high users share similar characteristics? There could be many answers to that questions for example stress and no time to exercise due to work however the main root is social determinants of health further discussed in the paper. High users tend to have lower house income along with poor self-perceived health. Those with lower socio economic status, low income, facing food insecurity along with housing issues are likely to become high users within the next five years. To prove that statement The Canadian Institute for Health Information stated, approximately 34,100 individuals were hospitalized due to chronic illnesses which could have been avoided through primary care (Early Identification of People At-Risk of Hospitalization, pg.4). Not only are chronic diseases one of the leading cause of death in Ontario in addition also extremely costly. An average of 5% of the Ontario population takes account for about 85% of the total provincial spending addition to hospital and home care. That of course, is tonnes of dollars, to reduce costs and save money it's important to minimize costs by investing into primary care. This topic of primary care being effective will go more into depth on page six. Social determinants of health are a form of prerequisite for the overall health of an individual. When an individual or family accesses the health care system, they do not just arrive with their mental or physical health concern, they arrive with intersections of their identification (example, gender, social class, and age). Along with the intersection of the level of social determinants of health (example, income, employment and early childhood development) which are all interlinked with their level of health concern. According to a report released by the Toronto Central

An Overview of Fossils and Dinosaurs by State

An Overview of Fossils and Dinosaurs by State Do you know the official state dinosaur and fossil for the state you live in? State fossils or state dinosaurs have been named by 42 of the 50 states. Maryland, Missouri, Oklahoma and Wyoming have named one of each, while Kansas has named both an official marine and flying fossil. Three states Georgia, Oregon and Vermont have fossils of non-extinct species.  There is also the informally named but formally designated Capitalsaurus of Washington, D.C.   The state fossils make a much more consistent list than the state rocks, state minerals and state gemstones. Most are distinct creatures identified by species. On the other hand, some of the dinosaurs are honored as state fossils rather than state dinosaurs.   Dinosaurs and Fossils by State The Adoption Date lists the date that these were adopted as state symbols. The link usually goes to the best existing material from the respective state government or educational institution.  You can look up each of the geologic age terms in  the geologic time scale.   State Scientific Name Common Name (age) Adoption Date Alabama Basilosaurus cetoides Whale (Eocene) 1984 Alaska Mammuthus primigenius Mammoth (Pleistocene) 1986 Arizona Araucarioxylon arizonicum Petrified Wood (Triassic) 1988 California Smilodon californicus Saber-toothed cat (Quaternary) 1973 Colorado Stegosaurus Stegosaurus (Cretaceous) 1982 Connecticut Eubrontes giganteus Dinosaur Track (Jurassic) 1991 Deleware Belemnitalla americana Belemnite (Cretaceous) 1996 Georgia Shark tooth (Cenozoic) 1976 Idaho Equus simplicidens Hagerman horse (Pliocene) 1988 Illinois Tullimonstrum gregarium Tully Monster (Carboniferous) 1989 Kansas PteranodonTylosaurus Pterosaur (Cretaceous) Mosasaur (Cretaceous) 20142014 Kentucky Brachiopod (Paleozoic) 1986 Louisiana Palmoxylon Petrified Palm wood (Cretaceous) 1976 Maine Pertica quadrifaria Fern-like plant (Devonian) 1985 Maryland Astrodon johnstoni Ecphora gardnerae Sauropod dinosaur (Cretaceous)Gastropod (Miocene) 19981994 Massachusetts Dinosaur tracks (Triassic) 1980 Michigan Mammut americanum Mastadon (Pleistocene) 2002 Mississippi Basilosaurus cetoides Zygorhiza kochii Whale (Eocene)Whale (Eocene) 19811981 Missouri Delocrinus missouriensis Hypsibema missouriense Crinoid (Carboniferous) Duck-billed dinosaur (Cretaceous) 19892004 Montana Maiasaura peeblesorum Duck-billed dinosaur (Cretaceous) 1985 Nebraska Archidiskodon imperator Mammoth (Pleistocene) 1967 Nevada Shonisaurus popularis Ichthyosaur (Triassic) 1977 New Jersey Hadrosaurus foulkii Duck-billed dinosaur (Cretaceous) 1991 New Mexico Coelophysis bauri Dinosaur (Triassic) 1981 New York Eurypterus remipes Sea scorpion (Silurian) 1984 North Carolina Carcharodon megalodon Megalodon (Cenozoic) 2013 North Dakota Teredo Petrified Wood (Cretaceous and Tertiary) 1967 Ohio Isotelus Trilobite (Ordovician) 1985 Oklahoma Saurophaganax maximusAcrocanthosaurus atokensis Theropod dinosaur (Jurassic) Theropod dinosaur (Cretaceous) 20002006 Oregon Metasequoia Dawn redwood (Cenozoic) 2005 Pennsylvania Phacops rana Trilobite (Devonian) 1988 South Carolina Mammuthus columbi Mammoth (Pleistocene) 2014 South Dakota Triceratops (Dinosaur) 1988 Tennessee Pterotrigonia thoracica Bivalve (Cretaceous) 1998 Texas Sauropod (Cretaceous) 2009 Utah Allosaurus Theropod dinosaur (Jurassic) 1988 Vermont Delphinapterus leucas Beluga whale (Pleistocene) 1993 Virginia Chesapecten jeffersonius Scallop (Neogene) 1993 Washington Mammuthus columbi Mammoth (Pleistocene) 1998 West Virginia Megalonyx jeffersoni Giant ground sloth (Pleistocene) 2008 Wisconsin Calymene celebra Trilobite (Paleozoic) 1985 Wyoming KnightiaTriceratops Fish (Paleogene) (Cretaceous) 19871994 Edited by Brooks Mitchell

You can decide Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

You can decide - Essay Example Therefore over time animals evolve not only physical attributes to be able to catch and devour their prey and avoid being the prey of larger animals, but instinctive behavior patterns as well. In this case the lions take advantage of their similar color to hide in the tall grass. They know they cant conquer the large adult buffalo so they go after the smaller baby who tries unsuccessfully to escape into the river. Two crocodiles seeing a prey of opportunity try to pull the baby into the river but lose out in a tug of war to the more numerous lions. Just as the lions are about to finish off the baby the adults return and with their superior size and horns are able to rescue the still alive baby and fend off the lions. This event shows that while the lions instinctively only successfully attack the baby buffalo, they did not have the foresight to realize the adult buffalo would return to try to rescue their young. Life in the wild for animals is a constant struggle to prey on more vuln erable for food and to avoid being preyed upon themselves. While over time they evolve physical characteristics and instinctive behavior to enhance their survivability, they generally do not develop the intellectual capacity to refrain from a tempting target which could spark effective counterattack. Man has this ability which allows him to evolve to the top of the food chain in spite of potentially more powerful adversaries. Cells are the building blocks of life. As the Cells Alive website states they divide naturally in a newborn producing new cells with minuscule changes in order that their host species of animal is better equipped to survive in their particular environment. These adaptive changes called mitosis occur slowly over hundreds if not thousands of years . A baby is a combination of the mother’s and father’s genes or cell structures and likely there are also small changes that neither parent has. While most cells have specialized